Today, I want to convince you of something else. I think some of my other letters and emails have been well received, and it is my hope that this one will be as well. I am, however, somewhat conscious of the fact that what I am about to say will probably not be as easy to digest as before:
I believe we here in the West--Australia most perceptibly--are undergoing a process of political, economic--societal--collapse.
Some of the most obvious signs that this is so is the social and and individual atomisation that is continuing to accelerate in our communities. To put myself--for example--to productive use in our city, I have had to engage various forms of state and non-governmental (read: privatised) organisations in order to navigate my way through mental health rehabilitation. Each interaction I have with a person who represents these bodies is more faceless than the next. I have no idea what relationship each Centrelink officer bears with the others. The whole process is as mysterious to me as it is harrowing.
Another prominent example I have to evince for my argument that our society is collapsing is to point to a factor that is even more baldly situated in materialist analysis: the cost of living.
We--and I mean each of us concretely and locally--are not merely a generation relatively more impoverished than the last. We are many times more impoverished. Somehow, I think the reality that we, us youngsters, may be just as, if not less wealthy than our great grandparents may be difficult to accept. But I think it is true. Whatever social equality that was reached in the late-1970s and early-1980s here in Australia has more than completely been undone.
If you need me to provide some numeric data on the issue, I believe I can. Just look at the graphs recently calculated that illustrate the share of GDP that returns to capital as opposed to the people:
This is enough for myself alone to remain convinced that we are undergoing a societal collapse. We, the workers, the people, have not really gotten any wealthier than we were in 1972.
What Is To Be Done?
The silver lining in these dark clouds I predict--certainly the trend is going to continue, and things will degenerate further--is that Anarchy has, perhaps for the first time in a long while, a chance for a beautiful flourishing. Nobody but the anarchists has the correct analysis, and most effective remedy to State and Capital. The Bureaucratisation of human social relations, and abject plundering of our human energies and creative essence by State Capital does not have to continue.
Many I talk to--either somewhat educated on the topic, or otherwise--on the radical left who do not identify with anarchism seem completely unable to grasp the nuance that Anarchy does not represent "Chaos", and "Hyper-individualism". It lead me, for a time, to believe that anarchists must be a somewhat fanatical and impulsive bunch.
I suppose I find this instructive. Along with my observation that "Anarchy" is on the lips of many youngsters these days,* I think we may be able to identify three lessons about the perennial fact that anarchism is a philosophy that is misunderstood due, in large part, to ignorance.
These lessons are that we can:
#0 -> Appeal to the natural impulse people exhibit against the all-looming, and, now steadily encroaching power of State Authority.
#1 -> Trust in the idea that mutual aid builds communities of anarchists better than any other method aids the Authoritarian.
#2 -> Celebrate the fact that Anarchy doesn't exclude interpersonal relations and activities as a key component of organising, but actively embraces and includes it.
In the interest of brevity, I will only say one thing in support of each of these points.
We should, in the case of point #0, never forget that anarchists have the clearest and most solid biological argument for our vision of a new society. Let us hold our comrade Peter Kropotkin in high esteem. Over and over again it has been demonstrated that organisms that become organised into societies of cooperative and socially interdependent patterns are the ones that best 'succeed' in adapting to their environmental selection pressures.
Further, when I turn to address #2, I cannot help but be reminded of the practice of anarchism we undertake here in Perth. The reason anarchy remains a live undertaking here, I feel, is the solid cadre of comrades that have coalesced around our collective practice. It is our interpersonal practice here, our interrelated and intersubjective understanding of the tradition that allows us to be strong. If anarchy didn't begin with the concept of Free Association, we would be no-where near as deep and firmly committed here in Perth as we are. We would be battered leaves in the wind.
I feel this naturally leads me to conclude with the second lesson that we will be able to impart on others in the context of our societal collapse here in the West. The precept of mutual aid unlocks the anarchist secret to the abolition of Capital and the State. Not only does anarchy demands that consumption be ethical--that is, free from power relations; those of domination. It also insists that production and distribution become transformed into processes free of hierarchy as well. Somehow, Marxists believe that while production can be solely relied upon to exculpate any immoralities within distribution and consumption. Let this, too, be not forgotten.
I hope deeply in my heart that each of you are doing and surviving as happily as you presently can,
* Indeed it may be that, if social forces where mechanical ones, the equal and opposite reaction to the massive speeding reach of the State in the wake of the Covid Pandemic is causing an increase in the popularity of Anarchy.